首页> 外文OA文献 >Plans, preferences or going with the flow: an online exploration of women's views and experiences of birth plans
【2h】

Plans, preferences or going with the flow: an online exploration of women's views and experiences of birth plans

机译:计划,偏好或顺其自然:在线浏览妇女对生育计划的看法和经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective\udTo explore women’s views of birth plans, and experiences of their completion and use.\udDesign\udA qualitative, exploratory study, using Internet-mediated research methods.\udSetting\udThe discussion boards of two well-known, UK-based, online parenting forums, where a series of questions relating to birth plans were posted.\udParticipants\udMembers of the selected parenting forums who had written and used, or who had chosen not to write or use, a birth plan.\udFindings\udWomen responded with a range of views and experiences relating to the completion and use of birth plans. The benefits of birth plans were described in terms of communication with healthcare professionals, potentially enhancing awareness of available options, and maintaining a sense of control during labour and birth. However, many respondents believed the idea of ‘planning’ birth was problematic, and described a reluctance to write a formal plan. The support of healthcare professionals, particularly midwives, was considered essential to the success of both writing and using birth plans.\udKey conclusions\udOur findings show a continued debate among women on the benefits and challenges involved in writing and using birth plans, suggesting problems for a ‘one size fits all’ approach often seen in the use of birth plan templates. In the context of maternity policy supporting women’s choice and personalised care, and as a way of acknowledging perceived problems of ‘planning’ for birth, a flexible approach to birth plans is required, including the consideration of employing alternative nomenclature. \udImplications for practice\udBirth plans remain a point of contention in care contexts around the world. Midwives and other healthcare providers play a central role in supporting women to discuss available options, whether or not they decide to complete a formal birth plan.
机译:目的\ ud探索妇女对生育计划的看法以及生育计划的完成和使用经验。\ udDesign \ ud使用互联网介导的研究方法进行定性,探索性研究。\ ud设置\ ud两个英国知名的讨论小组的讨论委员会在线育儿论坛,其中发布了一系列与生育计划有关的问题。\ udParticipants \ ud所选育儿论坛的成员编写和使用了生育计划,或者选择不写或不使用生育计划。\ udFindings \ udWomen回答具有与完成和使用生育计划有关的各种观点和经验。计划生育的好处是通过与医护人员的沟通来描述的,可能会增强人们对可用选项的认识,并在分娩和分娩期间保持控制感。但是,许多受访者认为“计划生育”的想法存在问题,并表示不愿制定正式计划。 \ ud关键结论\ ud我们的研究结果表明,妇女在编写和使用生育计划所涉及的好处和挑战方面仍存在争议,这表明存在问题一种“一刀切”的方法,通常在使用生育计划模板时就会看到。在支持妇女选择和个性化护理的生育政策的背景下,作为一种认识到“计划生育”问题的方法,需要一种灵活的计划生育方法,包括考虑采用替代命名法。 \ ud对实践的意义\ ud生育计划仍然是世界范围内护理领域争论的焦点。助产士和其他医疗保健提供者在支持妇女讨论可用的选择方案中起着中心作用,无论她们是否决定完成正式的生育计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号